Some news items that caught my eye:
A father gave his child the name ‘Like’.
Even though – get this – ‘he actually has fewer than 120 friends on Facebook and doesn’t really care for the social networking site.’
Well that’s alright then, as long as he doesn’t want to profit from it or get his name in the media…oh, oh, wait a minute…
It’s not as if he has the excuse of being famous; we all know how stupid that makes a parent at baby-naming time: Fifi Trixiebelle, Peaches Honeyblossom, Pixie, anyone? What were you thinking, Mr Geldof?
Maybe I’m not such a bad mother after all: ‘Tory Boy’ and ‘Spud Bud’ have a nice ring to them in comparison, don’t they?
Over in Michigan – which I have always considered to be a sensible State – a woman sold a two-year-old child on eBay.
It appears she did it to ‘see how eBay works.’ Wouldn’t a used DVD have sufficed? I’ve often wanted to give my children away but it never occurred to me to make a profit from them.
In case you’re worried but too lazy to click on the link, the child was removed from the woman’s care and ‘is in her mother’s custody.’
I must confess I’m still worried: why wasn’t she with her mother in the first place? When I said I’ve often wanted to give my children away, what I meant was, over my dead body, rigor mortised hands clenched round their pudgy little wrists and a ‘Noooooo’ scream etched on my blue yet still attractive face.
Have sex to save the rainforests
It’s a thing, apparently. An article in the Metro discusses ‘Eco-porn organisation F*** For Forest,’ an ‘erotic, non-profit group.’ They have 1300 members.
There is going to be a ball of some sort, at which ‘a small space where people can be exhibitionists’ will be provided.
I got this last bit from Wikipedia but you’ll have to find the link yourself because this is a family blog: In their first six months of existence the group received seed funding from the government of Norway.
You couldn’t make it up.
*
*
I have the funniest readers in the blogosphere (not necessarily ha ha…)